Quote:
Originally Posted by Cato Frankly, yes. That seems to me to be one of the main motivation. That and the peculiar need that some people have to impinge on the freedom of others. |
You really think that that's what's going on? Myself and others just want to control how everyone else leads their life? My background may be in law but I am actually not in favour of an overly rule/law-bound society. Most modern countries do however operate according to a complex set of legal norms. As I said before, if you have a problem with that or the norms in question, you need to take it up with your political representatives. The argument you are making here could be used to justify legalizing all drugs and indeed most things, if not everything.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cato The law on this issue cannot be justified. For me that is enough to cause the law to be modified or revoked. It is an unjust law that impinges on the liberty of the individual. |
How do you know it can't be justified? Have you researched this issue? Do you know the exact harms and benefits, the gains and the losses likely to flow from decriminalization? You seem to be assuming that there is no harm and therefore no just cause for prohibition. You are adopting an absolutist position and one which could potentially see all drugs decriminalized.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cato Hence why I said 'regulate it'. It should only me made available to over 21s. As to the rest, this has already been rebuffed by other posters. You have simply chosen to ignore them. Alcohol has much more series effects than cannabis; would you like to see it prohibited. Like everything moderation is the key, but any individual may do it to excess. Frankly, as long as it does not harm anyone else, that is their right. |
So, if I point to an newspaper article suggesting that cannabis can produce neglectful parents, and a pro-cannabis persons says they disagree, that's my argument rebuffed? You are showing your bias, Cato!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cato On that point I could agree, but only on a practical basis. We would need to get the UK, at least, to jump with us to avoid those consequences. Do you really think that the criminal element would be worse or better than it is now? Right now the policy of prohibition that you support is enriching gangs here in Ireland, needlessly criminalizing users, costing the state a fortune in enforcement, and making the drugs, because of contaminants, dangerous. Are you happy with all of those consequences? Really? |
So we would have to get the UK to adopt the same laws? What about France, Italy, Spain, Portugal? Drugs and drug trakfficking represent a global phenomenon/challenge. National solutions won't suffice.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cato That's merely your uninformed judgment. Nobody here has reported being 'controlled' by cannabis. Drama much? |
Multiple posters have spoken of trying to source cannabis, how much they spend on it, the efforts they go to to get it, the risks they expose themselves to to consume it, how they basically can't function without it, etc. If that doesn't constitute being in thrall to something, I don't know what does!!