Politics.ie
Advertise on Politics.ie

Go Back   Politics.ie > General Discussion > Current Affairs

Hey there!

It looks like you're enjoying Politics.ie but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members and much more. Joining Politics.ie is completely free. Register now!

Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.

30kg of Plutonium "lost" at Sellafield

This is a discussion on 30kg of Plutonium "lost" at Sellafield within the Current Affairs forums, part of the General Discussion category on Politics.ie. But don't worry kids, it's only a "paper loss". Presumably the type that gives you paper cancer. The Times reports ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 17th February 2005
Libero's Avatar
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dublin City
Posts: 6,119
Default 30kg of Plutonium "lost" at Sellafield

But don't worry kids, it's only a "paper loss". Presumably the type that gives you paper cancer.

The Times reports that 19kg was lost in 2003, and 50kg over the last ten years.

BNFL have dismissed it as "an accounting issue". Well, I guess Enron were an energy company too so maybe they're allowed do this kind of thing. And sure it's not like we expect nuclear scientists to be accurate with their calculations

The Times has a good report here, setting out how this discrepancy may be entirely innocent.
__________________
Romanes eunt domus
Reply With Quote

Advertise on Politics.ie

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 17th February 2005
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 402
Default

I believe it could be an accounting error. However, if they're accounting is so flaky how do we know anything about their plutonium? It seems clear that if there have been multiple accounting errors on the negative side there should have been some on the positive side.

People would freak if they didn't keep any record at all. If they can just brush off inconsistencies as 'just an accounting error' then how is that any different than not keeping records at all.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 17th February 2005
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,791
Default

"Don't worry Minister, it's safely in the Irish Sea."
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 1st September 2005
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6
Default

1940s: Windscale opened.
1957: Fire at Pile No. 1 destroys the reactor and causes Pile No. 2 to be shut down. A large portion of Windscale is sold off to BNFL, and the name is changed to Sellafield.
1981: Fire at the advanced gas-cooled reactor. Reactor is subsequently shut down.
2005: 19kg of nuclear fuel was unaccounted for in 2003, and a total of 50kg over the last ten years.
2005: A pipe, leaking radioactive materials, has been found. It has already been leaking for months before it was discovered.

And that's all the stuff we know about. How many accidents have happened that didn't make the news?

PS: I'm for nuclear power, but Sellafield scares me more than what lies inside the sarcophagus at Chernobyl.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 1st September 2005
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dublin
Posts: 18,022
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Odaise Gaelach
1940s: Windscale opened.
1957: Fire at Pile No. 1 destroys the reactor and causes Pile No. 2 to be shut down. A large portion of Windscale is sold off to BNFL, and the name is changed to Sellafield.
1981: Fire at the advanced gas-cooled reactor. Reactor is subsequently shut down.
2005: 19kg of nuclear fuel was unaccounted for in 2003, and a total of 50kg over the last ten years.
2005: A pipe, leaking radioactive materials, has been found. It has already been leaking for months before it was discovered.

And that's all the stuff we know about. How many accidents have happened that didn't make the news?

PS: I'm for nuclear power, but Sellafield scares me more than what lies inside the sarcophagus at Chernobyl.
Re use of 'Windscale', pretty certain this was the name of the location well into the 1970s IIRC.
__________________
This day in Irish History:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


COUNTRY FIRST
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 4th September 2005
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6
Default

Was it? My bad then, I thought that they renamed the plant shortly after the accident in 1957.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
St. Vincents "National" Cystic Fibrosis Unit adopt "Dubs only policy" White Horse Health and Social Affairs 9 18th May 2009 01:01 PM
Shock, Horror - Iona Institute Finds Religious People are "Happier" & "Healthier" A_man_about_a_dog Culture & Community 167 14th April 2009 04:17 PM
PC gone Mad! - Oxford University Press has removed words like "aisle", "bishop", "cha Catalpa Current Affairs 18 5th January 2009 07:03 PM
"The smaller parties lost out" HanleyS Elections 4 28th May 2007 12:22 PM
40k Drugs cash "Lost" thebull Current Affairs 4 6th January 2006 09:11 PM


Advertise on Politics.ie

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:39 PM.