it is not, in any way, doubtful. All the very best scientists are unanimous. We also have a thing called common-sense, well at least some of us do. It makes no sense that our huge increase in fossil fuel burning, deforestation would do anything but cause serious global warming.

You would have to be as illogical and stupid as the creationists or young-earthers not to accept man-made global warming.

__________________
"...Money exists not by nature but by law." Aristotle (Ethics, 1133)

Hopefully the idiots in the photo will take their arguement to its logical conclusion by reducucing their carbon footprint to zero.

I helpfully suggest that they and their fellow Green/Frootloop travellers should lower their carbon footprint by sterilizing themselves and then ceremoniously hop off a cliff somewhere (holding hands)

Man made Global Warming, btw this has now been changed by every authority on it to Man made Climate Change. Why? because the earth is no longer warming, it is cooling!

Take a look at the facts surrounding so called "Man made climate change" I have been through this subject many times over the years and gradually at first and then rapidly I discovered that a whole lot of it was nonsense. Research it yourself if you are so interested and draw your own conclusions as I have.

See Global Warming ate my data

This is just some of dozens of things I have read about the flaws in the theory of climate change and I am not going to link to everything as I did the research in order to discover the truth, not to win internet debates.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Which branch of the sciences did you qualify in?

Terrorism, au contraire, Jeremy will thank them for giving him some manure for his compost which will turn it into "black gold" (see below). There's always an up-side

From: http://www.allotment.org.uk/

do you know the differences between picking up a few stories from random unpeer-reviewed blogs made by faceless lonns and the statements of consensus from large respected scientific institutes?

the first is that bloggers have nothing to lose and can and will spout any crap and public institutions have reputtations to uphold so will take a more considered view of the data.

the overwhelming consensus in the scientific community is that climate change is real and that man has an impact on it.

The sooner you accept that the sooner we can move onto more interesting things.

the first sign of a good researcher is a showing sources to back-up claims.

not doing so opens you up to claims of forgery or lies.

So what? Does that mean a man should have horse sh8Te dumped at his gate simply because he is wrong?

This pious zealous eco religion fundamentalism is frightening. Clarkson has the right to be wrong. It's called free speech! Get used to it.

Well if I ever come across any dead roadkill rabbits or hares I'm considering dumping them on the doorstep of my local Green. as a reminder. He'll find them when he comes back from the pub after drinking, laughing and joking with the same people the Greens just awarded hare netting licenses for coursing to yesterday. It's about time these Green hypocrites were shown that 'eco-terrorism' can work both ways...

__________________
“The Green Party is completely opposed to violence and cruelty to animals and as we campaign to take enough seats so that we can have a role in the next government we will do everything in our power to end these cruel activities." - Trevor Sargent 2007


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
to have animal cruelty finally banned in Ireland. Yet another Green Party promise reneged on.

So doubtable, in fact, that every almost national scientific body in the world says we do.
If we really did have something to do with increasing global temperatures, why would they all be so eager to say it?