To be fair, they do have a point. If they start naming places then the nay-sayers will be in of a shot with shots of, "My rights! They're trying to impose a power station on us!!!" They are looking for national support for the idea so alienating communities and giving the skeptics an audience to target/scaremonger is the last thing they'd want to do.

There is technical info on the site and as I said previously on this thread, the numbers do seem to add up. (Although I'll be reserving my final judgment until the whole thing is infront of me and I've time to pour over the finer points). Also the names and qualifications/experience of those involved (the driving force anyways) are all listed there for you.