View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 13th March 2009
myksav myksav is offline
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 8,186
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ibis View Post
and



Note that: (a) this only permits member states to charge - it does not mandate it; (b) it estimates road costs would only rise by 3% if member states do decide to charge; and (c) you can get around the charges by using cleaner lorries - or, god forbid, rail.

It may well still banjax the Irish hauliers, though.
It would banjax a bit more than the hauliers. We have higher base costs in haulage than most European companies. We don't have the rail infrastructure that Europe has and there would be a disconnect between the mainland and here anyway, if we did have good rail. The ferry points. The switch from land to sea and back adds freight costs.

Maybe we should make a rail tunnel to mainland Europe via Britain.

I'm a bit suprised that Elsbeth type engines haven't been used in more trucks, they're cleaner than standard diesels and more efficient, with a wider range of fuel oils usable.
__________________
The enemy of my enemy is the enemy of my enemy.

Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action.

There are lies, damn lies and debatable points. "I'm not shouting, I'm making an assertive point." M. Martin
Reply With Quote