Well i don't need to argue with you sir, you know your stuff. But I will say a little.....

What is informed? Would the digestive processes of acquired information be acceptable? Bob is unaware of the nature of what he puts into his own body, as if they should be separated because his stereotypical views are supported by the established media. He is unaware of the current state of the progressive review on this issue in other countries having challenged you on it. He has pigeon holed consumers off this substance as part of his reality construct. I could wander elsewhere amongst his reflections on this issue, but you have adequately done this already. Perhaps misinformed is the wrong word, rather than uninformed, in which case why be so persistent? This is all a part of it......



Edit -let me say one more thing that needs to be mentioned every such time this discussion is fortunately broached, the somewhat pessimistic attitude of nay sayers is a consistent factor in the pain that is experienced not by people who want to use this substance, but by people who need to use this substance. Would they be condemned to a life of pain just because of block built lies. For some people this is the only thing that allows them to live a somewhat normal life. No this issue needs to be challenged every time, and you know it.